Papercrane vs Snowflake dashboards
Snowsight and Streamlit in Snowflake are built for people inside your org. Papercrane is built for everyone else.
Fine for internal analytics. The moment the audience extends past your org, the model runs out of room.
Every viewer needs a Snowflake account
You can't send a dashboard to a client or a user of your product without provisioning them first.
Warehouse credits on every view
Runs on warehouse compute. Client-facing traffic compounds fast — cost scales with engagement, not build time.
Looks like Snowflake, not like your product
Snowsight chrome or Streamlit styling. Neither feels like it came from your team.
Snowflake column covers Snowsight dashboards and Streamlit in Snowflake.
Share with anyone
Magic links, public shares, and custom domains. No Snowflake account required for viewers.
Looks like your product
React/Mantine components with full theming. Client portals and branded reports, indistinguishable from something your team built.
Flat cost regardless of traffic
Infrastructure cost doesn't scale with views. 1 viewer or 1,000 viewers — same footprint.
A note on Streamlit
Streamlit is a great framework for quick internal data tools built from a notebook — one widget at a time, shared with a team. For a multi-widget, client-facing dashboard product, it's a different shape of tool.
When Snowflake's built-in dashboards are the right choice
Every viewer is inside your Snowflake org, data needs to stay in the warehouse, UI polish doesn't matter. Papercrane fits when you need to share outside your org, brand the output, or serve steady traffic without paying compute per view.
Free to start. Works with your Snowflake data. No account required for viewers.